18
Mar/10
2

The Ubiquity of Facebook and Twitter

This post is more so a raw and unrefined observation/opinion of mine, rather than a picking apart of the two services. For some time I’ve wanted to write a blog post about how Facebook has become the new mass media, or how Twitter has seemingly morphed to a medium, but I think it’s probably even smarter to discuss the ubiquity of these two services as it encompasses both topics.

I think it goes without saying that Facebook and Twitter are huge. Taking a quick glance at their usage statistics, you’ll see they’ve grown into behemoths in the social space.

As a disclaimer, I’m well aware that Twitter’s advertised user base of 75 million is grossly inflated, being as only 21% of its users are actually active, according to a brand new study by Barracuda Networks. But that’s neither here nor there, and doesn’t change the point of my argument.

When you get a new client and they want to go social, what’s the first thing you think of? Odds are, most of you raised your hand for Facebook. I’ll give it to you that Twitter isn’t for everyone, but let’s focus on Facebook for right now, a name that has basically become everyday diction for us. Do you realize that we all seem to immediately snap to Facebook? As if you’re retarded if you’re not on it.

I’m not saying that it’s not without good reason. It’s a stellar social network. It’s got everything from profiles, to photos and videos, to status updates, to corporate fan pages and groups. And it’s only getting better. The mobile site is brilliantly designed, and has grown to become the most visited mobile social network . So, I’m not here to say shame on you for looking to Facebook, but I do want to challenge you with the question: Why? Is it because all your other clients ended up with a Facebook Fan Page? Do you have a genuine argument as to why it’s the first thing that comes to mind, or is it because that’s just “what we do” nowadays?

Twitter, on the other hand, has reached a status that to me is quite different from Facebook. Because of the nature of the two services, I feel that Twitter took a different path, one towards channelization. Facebook is a social networking site. Twitter is a medium. I could be getting ahead of myself here, but the fashion in which Twitter has grown and is used, has led me to believe that we could be thinking about it all wrong. I don’t think Twitter is a social networking platform anymore; it’s transformed (not transcended) into something instrumental.

I think on some level it’s become as ordinary and unremarkable as the telephone, or email. We talk about not focusing on the tools, and I wholeheartedly agree. But isn’t that argument used to make the point of putting strategy ahead of tactics. What if Twitter really is just a tool. A tool like my iPhone, or my Samsung/TiVo combo. What is Twitter used for? Communication. It’s only a communication, and sometimes entertainment, tool; no different from the telephone or television. And the way we’ve instructed clients to use it, reflects that.

We measure our clients’ customer relationships in Facebook fans. We measure their “address book” in Twitter followers.

Sure it’s because of their mammoth size, but does anyone else realize that we’ve turned these two sites into the “Break Glass In Case of Emergency” social media services. They’ve become ubiquitous with the term Social Media. When you explain your job to your relatives, what do you say? I’d be surprised if neither Facebook nor Twitter came out of your mouth. When did “social media” become synonymous with these two sites/services/tools?

It’s a hackneyed term, and the vast majority of us don’t deserve the title, but why aren’t we called Digital Anthropologist or Ethnographers? Regardless of how many people may hate the usage of that title (and rightfully so), those same people (I’d hope) also understand that at the end of the day our job is about human beings connecting with human beings. Aren’t we all just digital social workers, hopefully making some kind of difference in peoples’ lives through smiles, laughter, or tears?

When did Facebook and Twitter become the masters of the universe, which have come to define our professional existences? And when did we become tools ourselves?

8
Oct/09
0

What’s The Point of Tumblr If Facebook Has Become My Lifestream?

Let’s skip the formalities. I know I haven’t made a post in eons. But it’s been a rough month and half. So, cut me some slack.

But if the past month has taught me anything, it’s been that it’d be nice to chronicle my life. I’ve had about three journals in my lifetime. Each of them lasting a few months before coming to an abrupt end. I’m sure many of you have had journals/diaries suffer the same fate.

I thought to myself that I seem to be doing a terrible job of keeping up with this blog, but even if I wasn’t, the point of it isn’t to tell my life’s story. Then I thought of starting a tumblelog. It’s quick, it’s easy, and I can post from just about anywhere thanks to its presence technology capabilities. But every time I told myself I’m going to sit down and create my tumblelog, I never do it. I don’t know if it’s lack of motivation, daily exhaustion, or otherwise.

I was never really into lifestreaming to begin with. It all seemed so voyeuristic. Hell, I think Lifecasting with Ovi by Nokia is a bit much. It’s tracking my position every ten minutes? Do I really want people to know exactly where I am at all times? It just sounds a little too…exposed. But then I thought about it. I’ve already exposed myself. I’ve already embraced lifestreaming to the nth degree. And that’s by being an avid Facebook user.

My Facebook account has been riding shotgun in my life for years now, having kicked Flickr, this blog, and the prospect of a tumblelog, to the side. I’m already uploading all my photos and videos to it, and tagging my friends. I express how I feel through status updates. I share cool links on my wall. I find out about parties through the events application. I reconnect with old friends, and make new ones. And ultimately, I’m living my life, all the while, it’s being quietly chronicled for safekeeping. It’s my life’s digital scrapbook.

So, what’s the point of having a tumblelog at this point, if my Facebook does it all (and offers an iPhone app to boot)? I don’t have the full answer, but I think it has something to do with the fact that a tumblelog, even if publicly available, is more personal. Like your own secret garden to silently place your thoughts, and share the more intimate aspects of your life that you may otherwise be uncomfortable broadcasting out to the wonderful world of Facebook. Because let’s be real, Facebook has become the new broadcast channel (could that be a blog post?).

I work on the internet. I play on the internet. I’ve found romance on the internet. It’s basically become my home, for better or worse. And I’m starting a tumblelog because psychologically it offers me a small crevice of (voyeuristic) privacy in a life that I, like so many others, have willingly handed over to the masses.